Development of Four-Tier Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Understanding of Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71289/18tnsy31Keywords:
development, four-tier, electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutionsAbstract
This paper outlines the level of validity and reliability of a four-tier diagnostic instrument to identify the level of understanding of students on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. The instrument development follows the stages proposed by Habiddin & Page (2019), namely mapping concepts, testing and interviewing, defining students' unscientific ideas, developing a four-tier prototype, validating the four-tier prototype, and refining the final four-tier instrument. The product eligibility percentage is 89.08%, which falls within the very feasible category.
References
Ardina, D., & Habiddin, H. (2023). Acid-base properties of salt solution: Study at a secondary school in Banyuwangi. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569(1), 30018. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112074
Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686.
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307.
Fany, L. A., & Ulianas, A. (2021). Analysis of Students Misconception using Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on Electrolyte and Nonelectrolyte Topic in SMAN 2 Padang. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies; Vol 29, No 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v29.1.3403
Habiddin, H., Akbar, D. F. K., Husniah, I., & Luna, P. (2022). Uncovering Students’ Understanding: Evidence for the Teaching of Acid-Base Properties of Salt Solution. Educacion Quimica, 33(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2022.1.79488
Habiddin, H., Ameliana, D. N., & Su’aidy, M. (2020). Development of a Four-Tier Instrument of Acid-Base Properties of Salt Solution. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 4(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v4n1.p51-57
Habiddin, H., & Nofinadya, S. A. (2021). The Multi-Tier Instrument in the Area of Chemistry and Science. In Insights Into Global Engineering Education After the Birth of Industry 5.0 (pp. 1–17). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.100098
Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
Husniah, I., Habiddin, H., Sua’idy, M., & Nuryono, N. (2019). Validating an instrument to investigate students’ conception of Salt hydrolysis. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), 1(1), 1–6.
Kirik, O. T., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 221–236.
Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222.
Pratiwi, A. N., Erlina, E., Lestari, I., Masriani, M., & Rasmawan, R. (2023). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on Colligative Properties of Solutions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11 SE-Research Articles), 10033–10042. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4018
Rahmadhany, D. N., Putri, H. Y., Raudah, N. A., & Arianisa, S. (2023). Analisis Pemahaman Siswa SMA Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit. Jurnal Sadewa : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(1 SE-Articles), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i1.497
Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple-Choice Tests and Student Understanding: What Is the Connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00053.x
Siswaningsih, W., Firman, H., & Rofifah, R. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Berbasis Piktorial Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA), 20(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36236
